Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services
The theory and practice of public
administration is increasingly concerned with placing the citizen at the center
of policymakers’ considerations, not just as target, but also as agent. The aim
is to develop policies and design services that respond to individuals’ needs
and are relevant to their circumstances. Concepts such ‘co-creation’ and
‘co-production’ have emerged to describe this systematic pursuit of sustained
collaboration between government agencies, non-government organizations,
communities and individual citizens. The Australian Government’s report Ahead
of the Game—the 2010 ‘blueprint’ for the reform of the Australian Public
Service (APS)—is cast in this light.
• The APS has been involved in
ongoing reform since the 1976 Coombs Royal Commission from which emerged a
whole-of-government approach to public administration. This New Public Management
invoked entrepreneurialism, outputs and metrics, the cutting of red tape, and a
view of the public as ‘consumers’. Over the past decade, this view has been
reframed to regard the public as ‘citizens’, whose agency matters and whose
right to participate directly or indirectly in decisions that affect them
should be actively facilitated. Such an approach honors the fundamental
principle of a democratic state—that power is to be exercised through, and
resides in, its citizens.
• In many democracies, citizen
participation in policymaking and service design has been debated or attempted,
but too infrequently realized. There have been some notable achievements, in both
advanced and developing countries, and there is abundant public policy
literature advocating thoroughgoing collaboration. But genuine engagement in
the ‘co-production’ of policy and services requires major shifts in the culture
and operations of government agencies. It demands of public servants new skills
as enablers, negotiators and collaborators. It demands of citizens an
orientation to the public good, a willingness to actively engage, and the
capabilities needed to participate and deliberate well. These are tall orders,
especially if citizens are disengaged and certain groups within the population
are marginalized.
• Most especially, effective
engagement by a citizen-centric public service requires political support for
the genuine devolution of power and decision-making to frontline public
servants and professionals—and to the citizens and stakeholders with whom they
engage. Ministers and agency heads have a major leadership responsibility here.